Nato/united Ko-gb Spreading Ukrainian (slavonic) Genocide

, newly elected ukrainian parliament still unable to make any definite decision concerning possible head of ukrainian security service. Who comes to us with a sword dies from the sword. 1. Why ukrainian parliament decides the question of NATO membership 2. Who is responsible 3. Ukraine is a slavic country 4. Some further perspectives The following brief survey may be considered as some comments to the recent campaign organized by the current state leaders of Ukraine aimed to share NATO's membership actions plan during the approaching spring summit of NATO in Bucharest (April 2-5, 2008). 1. Why ukrainian parliament decides the question of NATO membership On Tuesday, April 10 (2007) the 43d president of USA, G.W.Bush (elected from republican party) signed the bill ordering $10 mln as the help for Ukraine to join NATO. Because of huge quantity of other resolutions and bills passing through the senate's approval, this particular act was ratified possibly remaining unknown to the people living inside the USA. Since senate currently represents the majority of democrats, the corresponding bill actually reflects the official desire of at least of one political party of USA for at least 8 forthcoming years, and this does not seem to be reacted by anyone in USA. In fact $10 mln is not the amount somebody should look at. For example, the former secretary of ukrainian security and defence service is an official proprietor of more than two billions dollars and this does not seem to disturb anyone in Ukraine. The state debt of Ukraine is between $19 billions (according to the state estimates) and $45 billions (including the debts of regions and of corporations controlled by the state, i.e. 43% of total year product of Ukraine according to the estimates of the World Bank by the date). The most remarkable is that USA government face to its 231 anniversary judiciously confirmed the will for east-slavonic (e.g. ukrainian) control over Europe, in which the majority of USA citizens have no interest. Since the question of ukrainian (east-slavonic) military presence in europe, this time considering in terms of ukrainian (southwest russian) acceptance to NATO (the North Atlantic treaty organization), now is the subject and concerns only the european state institutions and the european peoples, it is natural to suppose that the corresponding feature (ukrainian attendance to NATO) is a subject of possible decisive consideration of the respectful EU/NATO institutions. And the mentioned …